tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8840067776782114927.post1665915607101041335..comments2024-03-27T18:31:28.539-07:00Comments on Waving Not Drowning: Using java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch to synchronize startup/shutdownArun Jacobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17781797469431108786noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8840067776782114927.post-76989897819069006972017-01-31T02:34:55.309-08:002017-01-31T02:34:55.309-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Thomas Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07719164592220472548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8840067776782114927.post-4712925615028386692009-12-14T01:56:34.947-08:002009-12-14T01:56:34.947-08:00The cost now of Synchronization is the cost when a...The cost now of Synchronization is the cost when a lock is contested - that is, if Thread-1 tries to get a lock that Thread-2 already has then Thread-1 has to wait for Thread-2 to release it. So there has been work done recently to reduce the need to exclusively lock other Threads from blocks of code. Things like a fixed volatile functionality, concurrent collection implementations inside the java.util.concurrent package, and more flexible locks inside the java.util.concurrent.lock package.carte sdhc 4gbhttp://www.zoombits.fr/carte-memoire/sd-hc/kingston-carte-4go-vidéo-sdhc-classe-4-(60min)/12884noreply@blogger.com